CLOSE READING
Up From Ugliness
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/opinion/sunday/douthat-up-from-ugliness.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
In this New York Times article, the author talks about the effects of Steve Jobs on society. He effectively uses, details, diction, and imagery to get his point across that Steve Jobs played a huge role in shaping society today.
The author uses very descriptive imagery to describe the world today and how Steve Jobs changed it for the better. He uses words such as "We wore leisure suits and shoulder pads, buried heart-of-pine floors under shag carpeting, and paneled our automobiles with artificial wood," (Douthat). This mostly appeals to the sense of sight and effectively gets a good picture across allowing the reader to get a good picture in their heads. He uses many descriptions like this, talking about the world in a pejorative sense, and then he comes in with Steve Jobs and the piece takes a whole different approach with better, brighter imagery, showing that Steve Jobs changed the world for the better.
This author also uses diction to get his point across. He uses many words that do a fantastic job of getting his point across, even though they are not generally commonly used words. He uses words such as "junk architecture," and "new urbanist." These saying do a great job getting his point across, which shows that he clearly used proper diction in this piece.
He also uses a great amount of details to get his point across. Once again going back to the imagery point, when he describes the world, which he does for the majority of this piece, he uses great amounts of imagery and details to explains his points. He uses phrases such as "ziggurats of cement," which are details that are not crucial to the story but are added anyway as additional details to help prove his point.
Very good close reading. You seem to really be getting the hang of DIDLS and the way they impact a piece. I particularly like your imagery paragraph, I can see how the sensory language impacts the article, which seems pretty rare for an article of this kind. Good work!
ReplyDeleteGreat ideas George! Your points on imagery, diction and detail support your thesis. I especially like your imagery paragraph, it has great examples and it really seems like you understand how to find it. I do think that your introduction paragraph and details paragraph could be more detailled. I think that would really make your point stronger. I also think you could use a conclusion paragraph. But other than that, great job!
ReplyDeleteGreat close reading, your analysis was well done and I liked the quotes you used to show the imagery and diction the author used. Those are some interesting quotes, especially "ziggurats" nice job picking that one out. All this language seems ripe with imagery, good analysis, but maybe a little more added to the details part could help it along a little bit more. Great job!
ReplyDelete